Yes. Clients think that loss of consortium involves the value of the physical aspects of a relationship (sex) when in actuality it is more valuable when it is argued based upon every other aspect of the relationship that is lost as a result of a given party’s injuries.
For example, a loss of consortium claim is much more valuable when an injured party can no longer make coffee for their partner as a result of their injuries for the rest of their lives as an example.
The smaller the loss as an example often documents those most important aspects of a relationship between two people that is the basis for a loss of consortium claim by the partner of an injured party.
Showing posts with label injuries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label injuries. Show all posts
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Thursday, August 23, 2012
I slipped and fell on water on the floor of a bathroom in a restaurant and sustained injuries, is the restaurant responsible?
Possibly. Even though an accident occurs on private property does not mean that the property owner is responsible for such injuries.
An injured party needs to show that the property owner had a duty to keep the bathroom floor in a clean and safe condition, that the property owner breached the duty (by failing to clean the bathroom floor or failing to repair a leaking sink as examples), that the slip and fall on the water on the floor caused the actual medical injuries, and that the injured party suffers actual damages.
Establishing each element is the definition of negligence under Nevada law and would document a case against a property owner for negligence.
An injured party needs to show that the property owner had a duty to keep the bathroom floor in a clean and safe condition, that the property owner breached the duty (by failing to clean the bathroom floor or failing to repair a leaking sink as examples), that the slip and fall on the water on the floor caused the actual medical injuries, and that the injured party suffers actual damages.
Establishing each element is the definition of negligence under Nevada law and would document a case against a property owner for negligence.
Labels:
injured party,
injuries,
negligence,
Nevada law,
slip and fall
Thursday, August 9, 2012
I do not have medical insurance, how can I receive treatment for my injuries after a car accident?
There are ways in which an injured party can obtain medical treatment after an accident including treatment under medical liens and medical payment insurance under the injured party’s own automobile insurance.
Medical liens are legal agreements with the medical providers in which the injured party agrees to compensate the medical provider from the proceeds of any settlement for medical services provided to the injured party prior to any such settlement.
Medical Payments (often called Med Pay) is insurance paid for under the injured party’s own insurance and covers any medical treatment that results from the accident up to the limits of coverage.
For example, $1,000.00 in Medical Payments Coverage under an injured party’s insurance would cover up to $1,000.00 of incurred medical expenses resulting from an accident during the term of the policy of insurance.
Medical liens are legal agreements with the medical providers in which the injured party agrees to compensate the medical provider from the proceeds of any settlement for medical services provided to the injured party prior to any such settlement.
Medical Payments (often called Med Pay) is insurance paid for under the injured party’s own insurance and covers any medical treatment that results from the accident up to the limits of coverage.
For example, $1,000.00 in Medical Payments Coverage under an injured party’s insurance would cover up to $1,000.00 of incurred medical expenses resulting from an accident during the term of the policy of insurance.
Location:
Office
Thursday, August 2, 2012
I was bit by my neighbor’s dog, do I have a cause of action against my neighbor?
Yes depending on the facts of the bite. Like any other negligence case, a person that is injured as a result of negligence must show a (1) duty on the part of the dog owner (i.e. that the owner knew or should have know that the dog had a propensity to bite), (2) breach of that duty (i.e. failure to warn, failure to keep the dog caged,or failure to protect those subject to being bitten by the dog), (3) the bite is the actual cause of the injuries sustained and (4) medical damages and/or injuries.
Labels:
dog bite,
injuries,
medical damages
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)